Friday, August 28, 2009

MY 20 FAVORITE MOVIES

One of the best things that ever happened to me as a film student is that I've become aware that there are a lot of great films all over the world all over the time movies have been made, more than the OSCAR winning movies that are famous in our country. I actually have a list of my top 100 favorite films but as of now I will resort to giving only TWENTY. I am very much looking forward to seeing more films that will inspire me not just as a film student, or a film enthusiast, or a young film critic (as all of us can be) but even more as a simple viewer, a simple person.

20. The Mist (Frank Darabont/2007/USA)



19. Memoirs of a Geisha (Rob Marshall/2005/USA)



18..  The Shawshank Redemption (Frank Darabont/1994/USA)



 17. Goodbye Lenin (Wolfgang Becker/2003/Germany)




16. The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (Peter Jackson /2003/USA)



15.. The Umbrellas of Cherbourg (Jacques Demy/1964/France)



14.. Rashomon (Akira Kurosawa/1950/Japan)


13. Joint Security Area (Park Chan-Wook/2000/SouthKorea)


12. Babel (Alejandro Gonzales-Inarritu/2006/USA,Japan,Mexico,Morocco)



11. Maynila sa mga Kuko ng Liwanag (Lino Brocka/1975/Philippines)


10. Finding Neverland (Marc Forster/2004/USA)



9.. Taeguk-Gi (Kang Je-gyu/2005/South Korea)


 8. I Saw the Sun (Mahsun Kirmizigul/2009/Turkey)





7. Amelie (Jean Pierre-Jeunet/2001/France)



6. A Beautiful Mind (Ron Howard/2001/USA)




5. Dances with Wolves (Kevin Costner/1990/USA)


4. Love of Siam (Chookiat Sakveerakul/2007/Thailand)



3. Forest Gump (Robert Zemeckis/1994/USA)


2. Departures (Yojiro Takita/2008/Japan)



1. The Bicycle Thief (Vittorio de Sica/1949/Italy)

 I never thought a masterpiece could be this simple yet after watching it for at least two years now I still can't forget how purified I felt after seeing this most heartwarming film ever for me. I love its simplicity. I adore its realism. I commend its earthly atmosphere that even Ang Lee admits. Seeing a film half a millenium ago, halfway around the world, and still feel it bone-deep..it is just amazing.


Wednesday, August 26, 2009

A CHEAP THRILL THAT REALLY THRILLS

EL MARIACHI (Robert Rodriguez/1992/USA)








Exploring cultural loss amidst the society’s fast changing living in the drug dealing action imagery describes the film El Mariachi. The film is a low-budgeted flick and this makes it outstanding and unbelievable because it is packed with many location changes, many characters, stunts, and even props ranging from guitars, to guns, to cars, and even prosthetics. It is a living testimony of a good film out of a not so good budget.

The main character (Carlos Gallardo) only wants to be a Mariachi and he tries his luck to a town where as destiny played a game of life and death with him, has been mistaken with a hustler who is trying to get the better of a drug lord.

The structure is very well defined. The objectives are clear and they are interestingly intertwined with each other’s goal creating a web of conflicts that resulted to action-packed sequences of running, chasing, and firings.

The director and cinematographer are so brave in shooting the film with no master shot, thinking that they only have to shoot the shots that they really want from the start for the benefits of cutting the expenses of negatives. What is really interesting for me in the film is that it didn’t look that it was shot with only a single camera. This is done by changing the positions of the camera as the action progresses which is definitely not easy and requires a lot of patience and passion.

From the point above, the main difference between El Mariachi and our local independent films is that El Mariachi didn’t attempt to look low budgeted or independent. You can actually always feel the commercial ‘feel’ of it all throughout the time. Specifically the camera set-up, it distinguishes the border of El Mariachi to ours in capturing consideration. The cast is the only element in the finished product I think that is very independent, all the rest, the technical manipulation, the entertaining and engaging plot and the action-romance genre are all commercial in nature. While the only independent inside the plot is the death of the protagonists’ love interest Domino (Consuelo Gomez).





Shooting most of the shots, if not everything, in a very limited film stock is a very risky thing to do in the production. There should be less or even no errors in the production and in the development and processing of the negative.

The result of this pop screenplay in a low budgeted and very independent mode of shooting is very impressive. El Mariachi tackles what has been lost in the life of the mariachi but we sure find the film as a film that we do not see every week or every month in our local movie houses or as something whose budget is so contained that gives yet a result so deceiving you wouldn’t even guess it’s cheap. El Mariachi is a first rate cheap film; and this is possible because of excellent production management.



Thursday, August 20, 2009

A BEAUTIFUL RITUAL CALLED GOOD FILMMAKING

Mangatyanan (Jerold Tarog/2009/Philippines)





Mangatyanan in simple words, is one of the films that keeps my faith in the unbelievable potentials of Philippine independent film making. The themes such as domestic violence, woman liberation, and patriarchal deconstruction or destruction are age-old themes and probably as old as the endangered ritual which is the titular of the film. But that exactly, the juxtaposition of the issues to a very semi-indigenous, semi-exotic, and raw and inevitably something unknown a cultural rite accompanied by heart pumping score work wonder for this well told piece of outstretched story in art.
Laya (Che Ramos) works with Eric (Neil Ryan Sese) in Isabela to photograph the probably last Mangatyanan ite to be performed, as she escapes from the obligation of visiting her well known father in the world of photography at the hospital. The rite is incompletely done as the supposedly successor ran away from the ritual, the pains of it and more importantly the obligation of heiring the position. As Laya and Eric waits for the bus going back to Manila, Laya learns that her father is already dead. Instead of going back home, she runs to the path of the unfinished Mangatyanan and finishes the whole process including the drinking of the liquid that is believed to enable the person to speak to the tribe's gods.
Producing any film is of course a mixture of a tiring and pleasurable experiences. But in the film, it can be doubled by the fact that they are going to a place that they might never have thought of. Going outside the metro for a shoot is as adrenaline bursting as an action movie. In fact, in terms of excitement, no one between the two has a far cry over the other. A mountainous area in Isabela can't make you bore to death. Producing such film is also fun because the story is about a photographer which is just the forerunner of the whole project you are making—film. I have seen some of the behind the scenes stills of Mangatyanan, and the actual stills of the BTS is essentially just like what the film is all about has got its structure--- a story through the passion in photos. This also calls for a challenging production design. As it is about a tribe with a dying ritual and culture, designing the beauty of the location, of the people, of the instruments is an experience that no lame production designer could ever attain.
I like the film practically because of five reasons and even though I like it I still have three issues about certain parts of the film
I admire the storytelling. As I have pointed out earlier, the subject matter is not something new. Despite the fact that movies about woman liberation and deconstruction tend to have the same take and same look and same resolutions, Mangatyanan finds her way to tell the story of Cinderella who is more passionate and that same passion led her to 'unforgive' her stepmothers and stepsisters. The film has just proved that no subject matter or theme can ever be dried, instead, everything is in any unimaginable way succulent.
I like its form. The functions of the parallelisms, similarities, differences, and variations are engaging enough to keep the viewers focus to the film while slowly absorbing how this element has something to do with a previous element without overdoing it that causes entertainment nausea out of elemental overload.
The narrative provides an excellent turning point, so excellent that I thought the first half of the film would completely be a bore without Laya finishing the Mangatyanan rite. Though the film is purely character driven, it has just been obvious in this part of the film. Escaping her social obligation of visiting her father in the hospital seems to plot driven but escape is also not any less than an objective. It is also her character that drives her away from her father. Her bold predicament to the ritual though clears the driving force of the film.
The cinematography especially and particularly in the scene where Laya is under trance seeing her father is a beauty in phantasmagoria. I love its dusty and yet pacific texture. Even the initial appearance of her father (Pen Medina), his staging and composition (that I want to specify his simple distance from Laya) is severely poignant and beautiful.




I commend that it is entertaining. While many other independent films try to be unentertaining by being self proclaimed as a film highly intellectuals can only draw power from it, Mangatyanan tries to tell a good story with a good appeal. I believe this film has a commercial potential. Which unfortunately reminds me how these beautiful a movie can't be produced commercially without Bea Alonzo or Marian Rivera playing Laya.
From this I would like to point out the actors' contribution to the entirety of the film. Che Ramos, Neil Ryan Sese, Irma Adlawan and other casts have given justifiable performances. Though I would like to comment that no one has really surpassed the 'just' performance which is expected. In other words, no one among them have really stood out. But biting into the bright side, they at least are convincing actors.
The fantasy scene is my favorite part in the film in terms of cinematography but I guess the conversation between the two has been prolonged. I didn't like that Laya's father talked so much. I also didn't like that he has to open his mouth to speak, it decreases the beauty in phantasmagoria I was talking about earlier. Lastly, I wish that the part where Laya and her father hesitantly hug each other was just deleted or at least polished their movements. In understand that the two has to be reconciled and they translated that resolution by the hugging but the movement is rough and so humanly mechanical that is very anti-fantasy where I expected every single movement in that scene be fluid and smooth.
I am also not a fan of the scene where Eric attended Laya in the hospital and said that he is there because she needs him to be there. It is very love team like and the two of them is a good working pair and not so good a love team. I am in anyway actually hoping for the absence of romantic love in the totality in the film because I believe that will cause injury in the feminist consistency of the film.
Over all, I still think that Mangatyanan, self referentially, without reading any intertextualities with its Confessional co-trilogy, is an admirable film. Though it is not flawless for me, it is not an enough to hate it or even lessen what I love about the film. The intensity of the film especially from its turning point that I have identified earlier until the well timed and rhymed fast sequences heading to the end comprised the films goodness with the largest percentage. That actually reminded me of Marc Forster's Finding Neverland where a turning point skyrocketed and never( at least essentially) decreased its acceleration and velocity until the very end leaving the audiences with a still hot sky rocket engine to give the film a round of applause it truly deserves.